The Real South Africa—Not Keeping It Real: A Story of Betrayal
The Real South Africa—Not Keeping It Real: A Story of Betrayal
What began as a dream trip transformed into a two-year ordeal marked by silence,
delays, and financial discrepancies. Adding to the pain of losing my mother, I was
confronted with a profound lack of accountability and transparency from a luxury travel
agency that champions pro-Black and pro-diaspora values, resulting in a $4,200 debt
that remains unpaid despite their implied agreement and my time of immense grief.
In February, I booked a trip to Durban, South Africa, for my mother and me. We chose to
use The Real South Africa payment plan through PayPal, making a down payment of
$1,125. Additionally, we requested apartment tours as part of our trip.
Dr. Latasha Blanton, one of the co-owners, contacted me regarding the trip after
noticing that my phone number was linked to my mother's email. I confirmed that this
was a mother-daughter trip. By May, we decided to change our plans because of the
massive floods that occurred in the KwaZulu-Natal (KZN) region in April 2022.
Since the floods brought back memories of what we went through during Hurricane
Harvey—an experience we did not want to relive—my mother requested that we switch
our trip to Johannesburg. At the time, The Real South Africa was promoting a real estate
tour. I told my mother that visiting South Africa as both a vacation and a "go-see" would
give her two experiences in one. Since my career, for which I was pursuing a license,
was closely related to real estate, I saw this as a field trip opportunity for me. We made
the decision to switch our trip to Johannesburg.
The Durban invoice was converted to The Real Estate Tour.
After switching our trip from Durban to Johannesburg, my mother and I began paying
down the payment plan from May through August. During this period, we encountered a
complication with the payment process. One day, we attempted to make a payment
through PayPal, but the transaction was restricted. Dr. Latasha Blanton informed me
that The Real South Africa (TRSA) had abruptly parted ways with PayPal and switched
to Stripe for payments.
This sudden change in payment processors was not handled professionally. We were
instructed to request refunds directly from PayPal and then transfer those same funds to
Stripe. This placed an unexpected task on us with TRSA changing payment vendors
midway through the pre-trip process.
I had to contact PayPal customer service and request a refund of several thousand
dollars from the payment plan. The PayPal representative questioned the unusual
nature of this request, which I found concerning. I wanted to avoid being caught in the
middle of a vendor dispute between TRSA and PayPal, but the situation was
unavoidable.
After following Dr. Blanton's instructions, I was finally able to process the refund and
transfer the funds to Stripe. However, I was charged in the process of transferring our
own money. Furthermore, while PayPal provided tracking information for invoice
balances, Stripe did not, which made it difficult to automatically monitor our payments.
By September, we had paid off the account. However, Dr. Blanton emailed me, claiming
that our balance was $1,985. Confident the account was paid off, I called and asked her
to provide invoices or records to clarify the discrepancy. She acted like she didn’t know
what I meant. Without receiving proof from her, I reviewed all our payments, including
bank transactions, refunded amounts, and transferred funds. After thorough
calculations, I concluded that I owed her only $5 and sent her an email detailing my
findings in a table.
When I called Dr. Blanton to acknowledge how challenging it was for both of us to go
through the documents, she rudely interrupted me, saying, 'All of it! And by the way, you
don’t owe me $5; you actually owe $10 instead. But I cleared that, so we can move
forward with the trip.' I couldn’t believe how she deflected and shifted the blame onto
me. She provided no evidence to support her claim. Despite this, I paid the additional
$10 to avoid further conflict. How did a $1,985 discrepancy caused by her mistake turn
into a $10 debt on my end—one that she claimed to graciously absolve in my favor?
At that point, I told my mother we should cancel the trip entirely. I no longer wanted to
be part of it, especially after feeling disrespected by Dr. Blanton’s tone and handling of
the situation. My mother was feeling unwell, and I still had to show proof of our
payments while Dr. Blanton failed to provide any documents from her side. Yet, my
mother insisted, saying, "No, no, we should still go with them."
This experience highlighted several red flags, starting with the PayPal representative’s
questions and the lack of transparency. The entire ordeal changed my perception of Dr.
Blanton and our plans for the trip.
In September, Dr. Blanton had sent out a terms and conditions document for all
travelers to sign, but we did not sign it. As we moved into October, we began receiving
emails from Dr. Blanton requesting flight information to arrange transportation.
I informed Dr. Blanton that my mother was hospitalized, and her doctors were uncertain
whether it was safe for her to travel. Toward the end of October, I confirmed that my
mother would not attend the real estate tour. We planned to keep the schedule intact,
aiming to rehabilitate my mother for the following year, as she had recovered from
medical issues in the past. Dr. Blanton was encouraging and supportive. She mentioned
another traveler with a similar experience planned to travel to South Africa the next year.
This gave us hope, and we started researching specialists for my mother.
However, by mid-November, we had to cancel the trip after my mother’s doctor
confirmed her condition was terminal. When I canceled via email, I requested a refund
and acknowledged that we would honor any applicable terms and conditions, despite
not having signed the document.
Dr. Blanton asked for my bank information, which I sent.
Although we did not attend the real estate tour, Dr. Blanton sent an email in late
November acknowledging my refund request, assuring me they had not forgotten about
it. I assumed the real estate tour had been exhausting for them, as it was their first time
organizing it, so I refrained from following up immediately. However, on December 16th,
I sent an email requesting a status update. Dr. Blanton responded a few days later,
stating there were issues with the bank processing direct deposits.
On December 21st, my mother was hospitalized and passed away that same day. Up
until then, we were hopeful that we could find a specialist to help her. I received two
deposits from The Real South Africa to my account in late December.
During this time, I also informed Dr. Blanton about my mother’s bank account,
explaining that Chase only accepted incoming payments. In the midst of planning the
funeral and dealing with a winter storm, estate matters, and religious arrangements, I
reached out again in January to inquire about my mother’s refund. Despite a few brief
emails, I was left uncertain about the status of the refund process, and the entire ordeal
stretched on far longer than expected. Amid this grief, the refund process turned into a
two-year nightmare.
In January 2023, after requesting a refund, Dr. Blanton responded that they were
waiting to consult their lawyers regarding my mother’s refund. She explained, “Your
mom is now deceased, and we need to make sure we don’t break any laws in this
process.”
I followed up with another email at the end of January but received no response.
Realizing I was being ignored, I sought legal counsel. At the time, I couldn't afford a
lawyer, but I eventually secured one through a volunteer network. Cameron Secord from
Jackson Walker reviewed my documentation and described the situation as a stalling
tactic. He added that TRSA does not intend to pay you. He suggested a four-email
campaign before filing a lawsuit. Dr. Blanton responded to the final email on March
28th.
In her response, Dr. Blanton requested the executor of my mother’s estate and legal
information. Despite prior communications where I had explained we were dealing with
estate issues, she showed no urgency. My mother had died intestate, and my family
was embroiled in disputes with our father regarding her estate, which delayed the
probate process.
For 21 months, March 2023 to January 2025, I heard nothing further from The Real
South Africa beyond one automated response in June 2024. I sent emails every three to
six months, informing them we were still dealing with probate and estate issues, but
these emails received no human reply.
During this time, I faced numerous personal challenges. My mother passed away in
December 2022, and shortly after, my nephew, who lived with me, became ill and
passed away the following year. I moved out of my apartment to start over. When I
secured work downtown with Harris County and the elections, I had to deal with a
criminal case after being stalked and attacked on Metro Rail in 2024. These hardships,
coupled with The Real South Africa’s silence, made the situation even more
overwhelming.
For nearly two years, my occasional inquiries about the refund were met with dead
silence. The only time they responded again was after I reported them to the federal
and state agencies in December 2024.
I filed complaints against The Real South Africa (registered in Virginia) with the Virginia
Attorney General, the Better Business Bureau (Central Virginia), the Federal Trade
Commission, and the Texas Attorney General. While I received automated responses
from the federal and Texas agencies, the Virginia agencies provided human responses.
The Better Business Bureau initially closed my case prematurely, claiming I hadn't
responded. After I disputed and resubmitted documents, they reopened it. The Virginia
Attorney General's dispute resolution specialist acknowledged my documents and
requested a response within two weeks, to which I complied, but received no further
communication. I found the abrupt closures and silences from the Virginia offices
concerning.
Upon reopening the Better Business Bureau case, I received my first communication
from TRSA after 21 months (since March 2023). The contact was from Mark Blanton,
whom I had never communicated with before. Previously, all correspondence had been
with Latasha Blanton. Mark Blanton introduced a refund policy that had never been
mentioned in any prior communication. In November 2022, Latasha Blanton requested
my direct deposit information to issue a refund.
In 2023, after I inquired about my late mother's refund of $4,200, Latasha Blanton stated
that she needed to consult her attorneys due to legal concerns regarding issuing a
refund to a deceased payee. A few months later, she requested executor or estate
information via email. Throughout these exchanges, the possibility of a refund was
implied through requests for bank and estate details. The requests contradicts Mark
Blanton's later claims. However, the refund policy cited by Mark Blanton had never
been mentioned or enforced in prior communications. Mark Blanton's sudden
involvement and the introduction of the refund policy appears to be a last ditch effort to
avoid accountability. This pattern of shifting narratives echoes a previous $1,985
discrepancy in September 2022 from Latasha Blanton, who mistook payment due
without providing supporting documentation. After demonstrating her error, she still
claimed I owed money.
This pattern of shifting narratives and retroactive policy enforcement prompted me to
email Mark Blanton directly. I informed him that the refund policy had never been
communicated and that I would have honored it if it had been. He did not respond. This
pattern of ignoring communication is consistent with their behavior.
Mark Blanton only communicated through the Better Business Bureau portal. I closed
the case after concluding that The Real South Africa:
• Avoids accountability.
• Shifts the burden of proof and narratives.
• Ignores communication.
• Has questionable business practices.
• Displays callousness towards grieving individuals.
In addition to potential local influences of TRSA, such as the Virginia agencies
prematurely closing my case or disappearing, I reached out to a prominent diaspora
influencer based in Houston but received no response. As a Houstonian, I found it
noteworthy that this 'pro-Black' local influencer, who is friends with The Real South
Africa, began featuring TRSA advertisements on their channel during the same period.
My late mother, who was a senior, trusted The Real South Africa, which promotes itself
using pro-Black rhetoric. Their actions, resembling those of other influencers who
exploit elderly Black individuals, raise serious concerns about integrity. What sets TRSA
apart is their professional pedigree, social capital, and business experience in the U.S.,
making their behavior all the more puzzling.
From retroactively enforcing a policy that had never been applied before, to the $1,985
discrepancy, followed by the 21-month silence, and the sudden appearance of Mr. Mark
Blanton—all of these events point to evasion and a consistent pattern of disregard.
TRSA presented themselves as champions of the Black diaspora, yet they treated my
elderly mother and me with the same disregard as any other exploitative scheme. This
betrayal is a stark reminder that even those who profess to stand for our community can
inflict the deepest wounds. I share my story not only to seek justice, but to warn others
and to implore those with influence to hold TRSA accountable.
FOR CLARITY AND UPDATE:
As of July 7, 2025, I received a formal response from the Virginia Office of the Attorney General, following up on my original January complaint. They noted that their certified letter to TRSA was returned to sender, and that they subsequently attempted contact via email—but received no response from the business. With this final acknowledgment from the fourth agency I contacted (FTC, BBB, Texas AG, and Virginia AG), I decided to come forward publicly to share my full story and protect others.
Im sorry for your loss. You though are in the wrong business wise. Payer services like PayPal was your obligation to get refund. Mentioning your indecisive order history dosnt help. You had personal problems that you blame others for. Finally the travel company used sound business intelligence to inquire how to process a refund to a deceased persons estate internationally. Since your mother died intestate. How can you again blame the travel agency. How can you demand a refund for your mother's travel contract? That becomes a probate debt. You fail to mention did you get your personal refund?
ReplyDeleteYou and your mothers separate bookings and processing incurred cost. Who should pay in your opinion? The best you should be asking for is a partial refund for yourself. Not your mom. You broke the contract. You're not taking accountability, and disparaging a company. Because you want black woman and sympathetic privileges. Sorry,but you're wrong.
Thank you for your comment. Just to clarify:
DeleteI mentioned PayPal and the earlier discrepancy not to blame, but to highlight a pattern of disorganization and miscommunication that happened before my mother’s death.
The $4,200 refund in question was acknowledged by TRSA while she was still alive. They requested her bank details, and later asked for estate information. This was not a PayPal issue—the funds had already been transferred, and the company committed to issuing the refund directly.
After her passing, Chase approved the refund under estate eligibility, but TRSA went silent—for 21 months.
I did receive a partial refund for my own portion—but my mother’s portion was never returned.
So this isn’t about avoiding responsibility. It’s about a company that failed to communicate, follow through, or act in good faith with a grieving family that followed all instructions.
This isn’t about “privilege.”
It’s about holding a company accountable for its promises, conduct, and silence—not just its policies.